Anyway, and all the people are to blame. But the most striking thing is that all these three forces were and are a United anti-Soviet, and now anti-Russian front. Not a bit embarrassed, its different the benchmark for present day and past of the country. Because by and large they are neither to past nor to the present and especially the future of the country is not the case. They have their own country and their people despise.
Reading materials in which the anti-Soviet liberals (often in one person) shoved some of concept, falsifying the essence and course of the Revolution of 1917, you can notice two conflicting positions. According to one, based on everything that happened a hundred years ago, was to break into political plane low and purely material aspirations “dense” of the Russian people, which was skillfully used nightmare manipulators – revolutionaries.
According to the second – the people were guided by high and pure aspirations about the future of their country, and all those dreadful revolutionaries manipulators have deceived the people in his dreams and aspirations.
It is clear that the essence produced by the liberal anti-Soviet manipulation and fraud is to hit it on the revolutionaries (read Bolsheviks). And under what sauce to do it – the second question. The natives say about the deceived people. Westerners – about dense people. And then I have to say on the verge of blasphemy.
I can understand (but not accept) the logic of the Westerners in their complaints that the people are not the same. At least they can see some prospect for the development of the concept of nation. After all, if he’s “dense”, it is possible to make it “enlightened”. I am not going to argue about what Westerners mean by “denseness” and “enlightenment” And how the first and second compatible with the survival of the people and the country they protect.
The natives on people giving up, making it defective, able to be deceived on such a essential issue as the future of the Fatherland. And how differently you can interpret them moaning about revolutionaries who demagoguery and political manipulation took and took from the people of his bright dreams of a just society? So much so that people have not noticed. There are conditional and rooted in the soil logically leads to the idea that people, as the flock needs a shepherd. Who would protect such “pure and righteous” people from the manipulators and demagogues, politicians, revolutionaries.
I am equally disgusting both of these anti-Soviet concept. And to talk about what is better and what is worse I will not. But you can at least just say two different views on the people and their history. As well as the fact that under certain conditions people are “Westerners” under what conditions might like. And the natives – not under any circumstances.
However, immediately raises the question about those terms “love” for his people from Westerners. And then it becomes obvious that there is no space for reciprocal movement of the Westerners and the people is not in sight. Westerners to move anywhere do not want. And the people…That Westerners have to offer people?
By the way, here we have to mention that Westerners – fevralisty beginning of the twentieth century, curse of the Russian people for the Communist choice and their modern namesake, is two big differences. The first was mainly conservatives-traditionalists. Yes, they combined it with a kind of cosmopolitanism, but still tried to base their concepts on the fundamentals of Modernity, the ideals of the French revolution. Modern figures, had assumed the name “Westerners”, lusting is not the ideals, but the West itself, as a kind of alternative to the Russian-ness. That is, the West as a political, geopolitical and even ideological enemy of Russia. And all that they offer is the dismantling of any of Russia (it is far from Communist) in favor of the power of its cartridge – West.
But to say this openly to the Russian society is terrible. And because all this anti-Russian activities covered all kinds of arguments about … the Western consumer Paradise. And elevated to the rank of “ideal” consumption applies to all. Not only the material side, but all the other sides of life. Including policy.
I’ll produce a gross oversimplification. But it is needed for clarity. Modern “Westerners” sing the clean European toilets, and for the sake of this “purity” in Russia is ready to Bang the country and “re-educate” (consider destroy) this strange Russian people, does not want to measure their historical dignity of the toilets.
Their historical predecessors cursed Russian people for several different. For attributed to him the desire to engage in the arrangement of their primitive “wild” life is not a Western, but “dense” representations of the good. By and large, that the pursuit of “low” in their view of social justice, they abandoned the high Western values. People’s notions of justice for those Westerner could not be any other as “vile”, because it was “dense” people. And those Westerners complained that, well, it all comes down to “public canteen” and arrangement of, roughly speaking, most of those toilets.
To argue about the presence of the highest aspirations of the Russian people, to get their hands a state institution, I don’t want to. Westerners do not see, looking at the past of its people through its historic elitist arrogance.
Well, the so-called “pochvenniki” admire deceived people – idealistic and almost altruistic, but curse him for this ability to be deceived.
Anyway, and all the people are to blame. But the most striking thing is that all these three forces were and are a United anti-Soviet, and now anti-Russian front. Not a bit embarrassed, its different the benchmark for present day and past of the country. Because by and large they are neither to past nor to the present and especially the future of the country is not the case. They have their own country and their people despise. And measuring historical usefulness of Russia “clean toilets” are not even ashamed of the baseness of the proposed criteria, taken from the progressive Western consumer hell. So, I see a sort of fork for a roast liberal country in the flames of hell.
Add to friends: LiveJournal | VK | Twitter | Facebook | classmates