About the counterfeits. Conclusions good

Original taken from sandra_rimskaya in SIGNS of TAMPERING

Original taken from galina6111 in SIGNS of TAMPERING



Parallel to the series “Crosses and lilies” we are starting a new big project articles “falsification of historical artifacts.The manual for alternatives.”The project is designed to help proponents of alternative history research.For publication characteristics,which can determine the reviewed artifact as counterfeit.And as for publishing the list of identified artifacts-counterfeits.A separate list for suspicious artifacts.


The work will be huge.The forgers were and time and money.
We have to rely on themselves and on you.Especially for you.
On a collective desire to have an idea about the real history,not fairy.
Sign 1.
Manuscript in Russian ( Slavic ) language,written fonts uncials and half-uncials – the counterfeits.ALL.Because these fonts for and were developed in the late 17th – early 18th centuries.
Details about the fonts uncials and half-uncials written in the article the Books of antiquity were fake! Proof and justification http://www.kramola.info/vesti/letopisi-proshlogo/knigi-stariny-glubokoj—poddelka-dokazatelstvo-i-obosnovanie
List of artifacts written in these fonts.As well as persons involved in their promotion :
1.OBVERSE ANNALISTIC ARCH OF TSAR IVAN IV THE TERRIBLE
font original Cyrillic alphabet.
Status is fake.
Source of promotion – Herman Sterligov and http://sterligoff.ru/oldp.html

2.Reims gospel https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Реймсское_Евангелие
It is believed that in the gospel, took the oath of the French kings, beginning with Henry III, then some of his successors including Louis XIV.
The first part, containing the Gospels read at the celebratory rite of the Orthodox Church, written in Cyrillic.Font – poluustav.
Status fake

3. Russian chronicle, which bore first the name of Nesterovoj, now called simply the “Primary Russian chronicle”.This chronicle, the”Tale of bygone years”, is preserved in several copies, in the early nineteenth century were famous for the following:
1) “Tale of bygone years by Nestor the monk of the Pechersky monastery Feodosievich”. This list with the name of Nestor belonged to the first known collector of manuscripts P. K. Khlebnikov (d. in 1777), then S. D. Poltoratsky (1803-1884), and where you got it Khlebnikov — is unknown. The document is written on paper in small sheet the layout, the story brought to 1098.
Status fake
2) “the Russian Vremennik, that is to say the Chronicler, which contains Russian History from 6370 (862) 7189 (1681) summer. 2. Moscow. 1790”.
Information about the font in the original are not yet available
3) “Chronicle, which contains Russian History from 6360 (862) 7106 (1598) year. Moscow, 1781”, also called Archangel’s list.
Information about the font in the original are not yet available
Most interesting of all existing lists[1] (and to think, the ancient is not found) is
4) Radziwill chronicle,which is preserved in the two lists of the XV century — in fact Radziwill, illustrated with numerous miniatures, and the Moscow-Academic.
The document is written in poluustav the end of the XV century and decorated with interesting pictures 604, which has an important archaeological value and is called the front, there is an illustrated list.
Status is fake.
The second major Radziwill copy of the list is “the Manuscript of the Moscow Theological Academy” written on the layout sheet 261. On the first worksheet labeled: “Trinity”, therefore it is called “Trinity” and on the last leaf is written, “Sergius monastery”. Until 1206, the text copies Radziwill chronicle almost word for word, with insignificant amendments. And from the moment on which the original Radziwill ends, it is continuous externally continued, but in a very different tone than the “Laurentian” for the same years, and brings his story up to 1419 quite independently, without repeating the original part of the Laurentian Codex.
Status fake
5) the Laurentian list, otherwise known as Suzdal or Musin-Pushkin, has the title “Behold the tale of bygone years, where did the Russian land, who in Kiev began the first of knyazhichi and from where the Russian earth began to eat”. Under the title of the manuscript can be dismantled: “the Book of the monastery Volodimirskaya Christmas”.
How and when we got “Lavrentiev list”? His own story is not out of the deeper end of the XVIII or early XIX century. In the early nineteenth century, it was presented to the renowned collector of books by count A. I. Musin-Pushkin to the Emperor Alexander I, who referred it to the Public library. That’s all.
Status fake
Source of information about fonts from various lists of “the Tale of bygone years” :
Valenski Sergey and Dmitry Kalyuzhny ANOTHER HISTORY of RUSSIA. From Europe to Mongolia
The conclusion about the status on the basis of the font in the original is mine.
In addition,walenski and Kalyuzhny ibid. describe the examination of the Radziwill chronicle.
The expert conclusion – fake.

Based on the analysis of various lists, it is possible to make an unambiguous conclusion :
“The tale of bygone years ”
Status fake
4. Ostromir gospel https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Устав_(font)
font – Statute
status fake
There is for me a certain little facts….
Namely : font uncials and half-uncials is written not only books !
…Charter is the oldest form of the Cyrillic alphabet, characteristic of the most ancient manuscripts. Cyril’s initial Charter was exactly the same as the typeface uncial (statutory) letters of the Greek liturgical books of the same time (IX—XI centuries) — in particular, among the oldest monuments found in the same italic type letters, as in the Byzantine Charter[3]….
This begs a more than logical conclusion.
If ALL the books in the Slavonic language,written Charter, and the layout counterfeits…
And St. Cyril the Charter in exactly the same Charter Greek liturgical books…
Turns out, ALL of the Greek liturgical books of the same time (IX—XI centuries) are the same counterfeits !
That,in turn,again and again leads us to the sacramental matter of baptism of Rus ‘ by Byzantium…
And was there a boy?
As could be the baptism of Rus ‘ by Byzantium without a common liturgical books,without a common language of worship and without a common attribute of the person baptized – baptismal cross.The Greeks Coj time don’t wear vests!
Adding to the question : What was Byzantium?
With attributed to her ancient high culture? For inclusion to which and hosted the baptism of Rus ‘ wild barbarian?
I plagued by vague suspicions…it Seems,found another confirmation of the fact that again right topper and fin…About the COMPLETELY fictional history of Europe during the first Millennium!

Here there is another point.Almost ALL the primary sources of antiquity and early Christianity became known in Europe after 1453.
As saved from the godless busurman-the Turks.From desecration,looting and destruction.
With absolutely no reference to the fact that Constantinople would be taken and plundered in 1204 by the crusaders.And the Byzantine Empire de facto ceased to exist.It did not influence the growth of the spirituality and culture of Europe.
I guess the robbers-the crusaders primarily concerned with the preservation of the Byzantine libraries.And put a stop to their plundering in the Bud!I like them…
Or simply had NOTHING to protect – to save?
Assuming that the Byzantine library in Greek were written in Russia in the 18th century ?
And Latin component in the Renaissance, invented by the humanists of Europe ?
While casting doubt on the history of Byzantium automatically casts doubt on the history of the Roman Empire.
So long ago and which does not suffer an impeccable reputation.
We select a list of counterfeits in a single,constantly updated list.
And look for – see signs of the determinants of counterfeit artifacts of other types.
And about the fonts…
About the fonts, you can look here… http://vaduhan-08.livejournal.com/33479.html
Sincerely Yours – Yaga and Holy crap.

The contents of the LOG http://galina6111.livejournal.com/614.html

Translated by Yandex Translate

Why the kings of St. Petersburg tsars against sabotage perpetrated

Статуэтка из Акамбаро
Figurine from the Acambaro

Here found under Acámbaro figurines – science declares them fake. But the rogue Schliemann with his fake treasures of Troy, believes. Believe and bastard Carter, in front of all the cars carried “treasures of Tutankhamun“first there, then back. Science ready even to believe in mysticism, defending his version of the story: believe those who were involved in the opening of the tomb, had been subjected to “curse of Tutankhamun”, although the rule of “Occam’s razor” it is more logical to assume – git cleaned witnesses.

I assure you, if we could find somewhere in the steppe Kurgan sword with embossed “Gaius Julius Caesar, the year 77 BC”, then science and it would have taken at face value, how to make coins-eimke with the date “1655”. In theory: the new chronology in Russia, allegedly, occurred after Peter the Great decree of 20 December 1699, i.e. as long in Russia was conducted chronology “from the creation of the World”, i.e. the date at that time totaled more than 7 thousand years. Continue reading “Why the kings of St. Petersburg tsars against sabotage perpetrated”

From the history of the “dark ages”

Глаз СахарыThe artifacts indicate that “the stone age” – an age when built of natural stone megalithic structures and cities such as St. Petersburg, “ancient Athens”, Melbourne or Cape town, ended in the 18th century – all unique technologies had been lost, began to build houses of wood, durable and built of brick.

I have completed an article on “the restoration of the national economy” in the 18th century – the construction of Railways in Russia and in Africa. And then arrived an article about the forgotten war.

I remember there was a movie “the Unknown war in the East”, made in English and translated into Russian. There was solid science fiction to a Western audience – the war of the USSR against the Nazis. To a Western audience that, in spite of documentary footage and realized that this is nasuada true.

So here’s an article about the forgotten war, which I read yesterday, this is the last war in the stone age. And here is the evidence. You can ignore them, but the reality is they won’t make another like it or hide your head in the sand. Continue reading “From the history of the “dark ages””

First results

Friend

Treated the selection as a whole, and have the opportunity to see the entire picture – albeit in the most General terms.
I recall in the sampling of natural disasters from 33 to 1933, inclusive (1054 all, part of the years without disasters).


Took regions of the Old world, i.e. Europe, North Africa and the Byzantine Empire with the Caucasus, appear in the Ancient world.
Refused inclusion in the sample resettlements, expulsions and mass repressions, without them it would be more accurate.
Russia is not included due to the originality. In the standard concept of “Old world” Russia, I somehow didn’t fit.
Main purpose: search of recurring events, e.g., tsunami in Northern Africa or the drought in Germany.
In itself, the repetition of the cataclysm means nothing, but if in year ten, and eight of them were repeated in the same interval, this is important.
Did the principled thing: dipped recurrence within the year.
If passed in Germany for the year 14 of epidemics, I leave you all alone – the fact of the epidemic in the region in a certain year.
While defeats more than victories. But there was certainty.
IMPORTANT: (late comment) as it turns out, I have incorrectly sorted the finished array. Remade. Conceptualize.

So we have 6562 events from 33 in 1933. That’s how they were distributed by region:
699 Italy
644 Germany
580 Europe Eastern
562 Western Europe
531 Turkey
524 France
435 Europe in General
432 Britain
274 Asia antique (Crescent)
249 Transcaucasia
243 Baltic
216 Iberian Peninsula
188 Greece
187 North Africa
174 the Alps
151 Europe North
150 Iceland
118 the World as a whole
90 South Europe
65 Macaronesia
35 Asia Western
15 East Africa (Ethiopia)
And that’s how they were distributed across types of disasters:
1537 Epidemic
738 Earthquake
437 Eruption
427 Hurricanes
415 Tsunami
398 Precipitation
388 Fires
362 Cold
325 Flood
280 Hunger
234 Comets and meteorites
218 Heat, drought
166 Mass psychosis
106 Signs
98 Storm surges
98 Locust and pests
80 Epizootic
80 crop damage
77 Ash, smoke
71 Chemical effects
27 Electrical phenomena
Hyperkalaemia with lots of variety of disasters and have a lot of correlations in other years.
Here is an example. Disaster 1347-1349, has in 1348 39 events and correlations – only in the 1780s years as much as 286.
Only this year has 1059 correlations.

Here is the distribution of the number of disasters of the Old world. A familiar failure in the 18th century. The peak at 1348.

And here is the distribution of correlations disasters. Pretty good.
In fact, correlations are halved, I just don’t have time to clean my mirror duplicates.

But the ratio of the number of correlations to the number of disasters. And the dynamics here are different.

And here I marked the years with at least 5 disasters and not less than 80 (actually 40) correlations.
It’s pretty tough conditions, and ancient catastrophes such requirements are not satisfied.

Now the same thing, but bigger and in the period. Here only labels.
Despite the fact that in the 19th century began the rapid development of seismology, Volcanology, meteorology, dramatically increased the number of observations, the world was covered by a mass of information networks, appeared in the media, and the ratio of the number of correlations to the disasters fell sharply.
The reason: up until the early 19th century the correlations are of abnormal character, and indicate the duplication and the rendition of documents.
It is also important concentration correlations at the beginning of the era of Great geographical discoveries.
For the simple reason that geographical discoveries strongly smeared by the paper scale, and with them udeblivelse and disasters.

The instrument was found not just good, but extraordinary importance. Was b lab, would upload to the fullest.
A dozen doctoral staff here definitely has )

Translated by Yandex Translate

The GULAG life-giving makes

Мюнхаузен“Johnny, do me a mounting”: “kiss” – “chick” – “baby”. This scheme, which the historians hide the historical process.

And when you ask a question: but that’s impossible! For example to build the Dragon rolls, on the level of technology and population, we are just talking about historians, it should be iron argument of Baron Munchausen on the question whether it is possible to pull yourself by the hair from a swamp: “you see, gentlemen – I’m with you!”

Once the Black sea is, then ancient ukry were able to dig him up. Wooden shovels. Continue reading “The GULAG life-giving makes”

About the counterfeits. Conclusions good

Original taken from sandra_rimskaya in SIGNS of TAMPERING

Original taken from galina6111 in SIGNS of TAMPERING



Parallel to the series “Crosses and lilies” we are starting a new big project articles “falsification of historical artifacts.The manual for alternatives.”The project is designed to help proponents of alternative history research.For publication characteristics,which can determine the reviewed artifact as counterfeit.And as for publishing the list of identified artifacts-counterfeits.A separate list for suspicious artifacts.


The work will be huge.The forgers were and time and money.
We have to rely on themselves and on you.Especially for you.
On a collective desire to have an idea about the real history,not fairy.
Sign 1.
Manuscript in Russian ( Slavic ) language,written fonts uncials and half-uncials – the counterfeits.ALL.Because these fonts for and were developed in the late 17th – early 18th centuries.
Details about the fonts uncials and half-uncials written in the article the Books of antiquity were fake! Proof and justification http://www.kramola.info/vesti/letopisi-proshlogo/knigi-stariny-glubokoj—poddelka-dokazatelstvo-i-obosnovanie
List of artifacts written in these fonts.As well as persons involved in their promotion :
1.OBVERSE ANNALISTIC ARCH OF TSAR IVAN IV THE TERRIBLE
font original Cyrillic alphabet.
Status is fake.
Source of promotion – Herman Sterligov and http://sterligoff.ru/oldp.html

2.Reims gospel https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Реймсское_Евангелие
It is believed that in the gospel, took the oath of the French kings, beginning with Henry III, then some of his successors including Louis XIV.
The first part, containing the Gospels read at the celebratory rite of the Orthodox Church, written in Cyrillic.Font – poluustav.
Status fake

3. Russian chronicle, which bore first the name of Nesterovoj, now called simply the “Primary Russian chronicle”.This chronicle, the”Tale of bygone years”, is preserved in several copies, in the early nineteenth century were famous for the following:
1) “Tale of bygone years by Nestor the monk of the Pechersky monastery Feodosievich”. This list with the name of Nestor belonged to the first known collector of manuscripts P. K. Khlebnikov (d. in 1777), then S. D. Poltoratsky (1803-1884), and where you got it Khlebnikov — is unknown. The document is written on paper in small sheet the layout, the story brought to 1098.
Status fake
2) “the Russian Vremennik, that is to say the Chronicler, which contains Russian History from 6370 (862) 7189 (1681) summer. 2. Moscow. 1790”.
Information about the font in the original are not yet available
3) “Chronicle, which contains Russian History from 6360 (862) 7106 (1598) year. Moscow, 1781”, also called Archangel’s list.
Information about the font in the original are not yet available
Most interesting of all existing lists[1] (and to think, the ancient is not found) is
4) Radziwill chronicle,which is preserved in the two lists of the XV century — in fact Radziwill, illustrated with numerous miniatures, and the Moscow-Academic.
The document is written in poluustav the end of the XV century and decorated with interesting pictures 604, which has an important archaeological value and is called the front, there is an illustrated list.
Status is fake.
The second major Radziwill copy of the list is “the Manuscript of the Moscow Theological Academy” written on the layout sheet 261. On the first worksheet labeled: “Trinity”, therefore it is called “Trinity” and on the last leaf is written, “Sergius monastery”. Until 1206, the text copies Radziwill chronicle almost word for word, with insignificant amendments. And from the moment on which the original Radziwill ends, it is continuous externally continued, but in a very different tone than the “Laurentian” for the same years, and brings his story up to 1419 quite independently, without repeating the original part of the Laurentian Codex.
Status fake
5) the Laurentian list, otherwise known as Suzdal or Musin-Pushkin, has the title “Behold the tale of bygone years, where did the Russian land, who in Kiev began the first of knyazhichi and from where the Russian earth began to eat”. Under the title of the manuscript can be dismantled: “the Book of the monastery Volodimirskaya Christmas”.
How and when we got “Lavrentiev list”? His own story is not out of the deeper end of the XVIII or early XIX century. In the early nineteenth century, it was presented to the renowned collector of books by count A. I. Musin-Pushkin to the Emperor Alexander I, who referred it to the Public library. That’s all.
Status fake
Source of information about fonts from various lists of “the Tale of bygone years” :
Valenski Sergey and Dmitry Kalyuzhny ANOTHER HISTORY of RUSSIA. From Europe to Mongolia
The conclusion about the status on the basis of the font in the original is mine.
In addition,walenski and Kalyuzhny ibid. describe the examination of the Radziwill chronicle.
The expert conclusion – fake.

Based on the analysis of various lists, it is possible to make an unambiguous conclusion :
“The tale of bygone years ”
Status fake
4. Ostromir gospel https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Устав_(font)
font – Statute
status fake
There is for me a certain little facts….
Namely : font uncials and half-uncials is written not only books !
…Charter is the oldest form of the Cyrillic alphabet, characteristic of the most ancient manuscripts. Cyril’s initial Charter was exactly the same as the typeface uncial (statutory) letters of the Greek liturgical books of the same time (IX—XI centuries) — in particular, among the oldest monuments found in the same italic type letters, as in the Byzantine Charter[3]….
This begs a more than logical conclusion.
If ALL the books in the Slavonic language,written Charter, and the layout counterfeits…
And St. Cyril the Charter in exactly the same Charter Greek liturgical books…
Turns out, ALL of the Greek liturgical books of the same time (IX—XI centuries) are the same counterfeits !
That,in turn,again and again leads us to the sacramental matter of baptism of Rus ‘ by Byzantium…
And was there a boy?
As could be the baptism of Rus ‘ by Byzantium without a common liturgical books,without a common language of worship and without a common attribute of the person baptized – baptismal cross.The Greeks Coj time don’t wear vests!
Adding to the question : What was Byzantium?
With attributed to her ancient high culture? For inclusion to which and hosted the baptism of Rus ‘ wild barbarian?
I plagued by vague suspicions…it Seems,found another confirmation of the fact that again right topper and fin…About the COMPLETELY fictional history of Europe during the first Millennium!

Here there is another point.Almost ALL the primary sources of antiquity and early Christianity became known in Europe after 1453.
As saved from the godless busurman-the Turks.From desecration,looting and destruction.
With absolutely no reference to the fact that Constantinople would be taken and plundered in 1204 by the crusaders.And the Byzantine Empire de facto ceased to exist.It did not influence the growth of the spirituality and culture of Europe.
I guess the robbers-the crusaders primarily concerned with the preservation of the Byzantine libraries.And put a stop to their plundering in the Bud!I like them…
Or simply had NOTHING to protect – to save?
Assuming that the Byzantine library in Greek were written in Russia in the 18th century ?
And Latin component in the Renaissance, invented by the humanists of Europe ?
While casting doubt on the history of Byzantium automatically casts doubt on the history of the Roman Empire.
So long ago and which does not suffer an impeccable reputation.
We select a list of counterfeits in a single,constantly updated list.
And look for – see signs of the determinants of counterfeit artifacts of other types.
And about the fonts…
About the fonts, you can look here… http://vaduhan-08.livejournal.com/33479.html
Sincerely Yours – Yaga and Holy crap.

The contents of the LOG http://galina6111.livejournal.com/614.html

Translated by Yandex Translate