- Mon, 23:21: Possessed https://t.co/XRd4BI6yTr
- Tue, 08:04: History of the Soviet Union in the covers of the weekly “Time” https://t.co/JvcT47Ow5u
- Tue, 17:01: Yes, let the “new challenge”!.. You need to somehow fight back. Otherwise, strangle to death! And, most importantly, loud to beat! https://t.co/27YvOFvPVP
- Tue, 17:18: End of Washington square?! And hints for the near future https://t.co/Kv0vQF4CNg
- Tue, 19:06: honor Code Buryat https://t.co/sflNdu3gUb
- Tue, 19:15: Meanwhile in Russia https://t.co/pVC6KAeJ9y
A separate article in the French wiki there is a small subsection of revisionism as a phenomenon
For historians, revisionism is a term without any special connotation which means a critical approach to rationally revise certain accepted views of history, or the General public (mostly), or even professional historians, laymen of the period or a particular field of expertise. It is based on receiving new information, a review of sources and offers a new interpretation of history .
As has been said by Comte , history is fundamentally ambiguous discipline, where the interpretation of historical reality one has to deal with the truths of his time, the historian being called to expect the speech to him by his contemporaries, his company, in accordance with the prejudices of his time, his people, facilities, etc. a Vivid example is reported by Vidal-Nacka , it is the work of Michelet , the French construction of the eternal homeland, through the romantic reader (and sometimes romantic) historical facts. Therefore, every historian should be as “revisionist”. New materials, new sources, removing political barriers, ideological, sociological, etc., allowing him to reconsider and to lead with new vision, new information, new sources, additional elements in the design of the Story.
Continue reading “Historical revisionism (Franz.)”
Published joint statement of Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill. Full text of the statement here.
Continue reading “According to the joint statement of the Patriarch and the Pope”
The point is not to be the first, and to believe in yourself
Comrades published an article commenting on the statement by the chief of army staff USA Brand Milly. It again noticed the American style be considered a threat to anyone who might be a threat. I want to share my understanding of this formula, because sometimes it seems that all these “threat for threat” and “is considered a threat to anyone who may challenge” and similar — some obscure one extremely unpleasant aspect of the situation.
Continue reading “The principle of selection threats”
If on the basis of secularism Kurginyan, to replace the words of the Apostle the notion of God on the notion of “History”, these words sound like a death sentence in surrenders:
Continue reading “Seven years later.”